.
Feedback

Ramp Up for Back-to-School with Bedtime Math

With the new school year upon us, help get your kids’ brains working again with this fun, free daily email newsletter.

Westchester, Rockland and Putnam students are heading back to school as summer winds down—which means it’s time for an abundance of expensive school supplies, backpacks full of complicated text books and dreaded questions about math homework.

With back-to-school stresses piling up, Laura Overdeck wants to let children and parents in on a little secret: math can be fun. Really

Overdeck is on a mission to change the way Americans think about math — especially given that math anxiety has been tracked in kids as young as age 5. This is what inspired her to create Bedtime Math, a nonprofit that sends out a daily email with a math problem tailored to “wee ones,” little and big kids. 

Overdeck is a Westfield native who now lives in Short Hills, NJ. She is an astrophysics graduate and MBA, but her love of math started long ago, by helping her mother measure ingredients while baking and her father, a hobbyist carpenter, calculate angles. Math was comfortably rolled into everyday life; flash cards and workbooks were never a part of her childhood.

She explains, “My mom was an English teacher—but she liked math and knew she could do it. For women and girls in particular, that makes all the difference. There’s a whole generation of moms out there who don’t like math, and it becomes a self-reinforcing cycle. My goal is to enable parents who are uncomfortable with math develop kids who really excel at it.” 

When Overdeck and her husband, a mathematician, had their first child, they naturally started incorporating math into their daily activities as a family but also into their nightly bedtime routine. By the time their third child was two and started clamoring for a math problem, Overdeck realized that they were onto something.

Lest you worry, the math problems aren’t pre-calculus for the preschool set; they’re fun, sometimes silly, verbal problems involving animals, sports, vehicles and more (and don’t worry, parents — the answers are provided, too).

Since launching in late February with an email list of around 20 or 30, Overdeck now has about 15,000 subscribers, and the list is growing daily. A book is in the works, as are plans to expand the group’s current work with local libraries and Boys & Girls Clubs.

Here’s a recent email offering, "Taking Its Toll": 

With August a peak time for summer travel, you might be spending more time in the car than usual – and more money on traveling. One sneaky cost is the tolls we pay on many major highways. Every time you drive some number of miles, you reach a row of tollbooths where you have to pay up for driving on that road. You can either throw coins into a basket, or in some places you let a magnetic card on your windshield signal that it’s you and that you need to be charged. Either way you have to pay, but you can get creative with the process – and can also get in trouble.

Wee ones (counting on fingers): If the toll needs 4 quarters, and you get to throw one in yourself from the back seat window, how many more quarters does the driver need to toss in?

Little kids: If you try throwing the coin out the passenger-side window and over the car to see if you can land it in the basket, and of the 12 coins you throw on a trip, only 8 make it in, how many coins end up on the ground? Bonus: If you get better with practice and your next 9 coins land in the basket, how many coins in total have made it into the basket?

Big kids: If you drive too fast through a toll, it won’t be able to charge your magnetic card – but it might snap your picture and mail you a ticket. If your trip requires $6 of tolls, but you speed through and get a $42 ticket for not paying them, how many times more expensive did your trip become? Bonus: If you drive the 6 miles between tollbooths in only 5 minutes, did your average speed exceed the speed limit of 65 miles per hour?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

gail burlakoff September 4, 2012 at 01:25 pm
If I still had young children I'd probably opt to do this at breakfast or dinner rather than at bedtime. Bedtime, for me, is the time to calm down and drift off...
NorthCountyHound September 4, 2012 at 01:57 pm
I grew up poor so I was forced to teach myself about money and its value. Spolied kids need nonsense like this, poor ones learn the hard way.
BG7 September 4, 2012 at 05:48 pm
Please, just because a kid is "not growing up poor" doesn't make them spoiled. Save your self-sorry bitterness.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.
drostan June 19, 2013 at 03:13 pm
A Response to the Response Mr. Michael Pointing, writing on behalf of United Water, opined in theRead More Journal News (June 7) and the Nyack Patch (June 11) that an Issues Conference on the pending desalination project is unnecessary. When it is so greatly to his personal and professional benefit to support this project, how can he expect to be taken seriously? Comments on the "desal" plant have only rarely mentioned that the radioactive tritium, which each day leaks into the Hudson from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant - just 3 miles upstream from the plant - will end up, in diluted form, in our drinking water. Problem is, although highly diluted, there's no way to filter out tritium since it is chemically identical to water. Worse, there's no known safe exposure level. Like "normal" water, tritium goes into your body as fast as you drink it. Good news: about half of the tritium you do drink is filtered out by the kidneys within about ten days. Bad news: When your kitchen faucet keeps providing you with small amounts of tritium day after day, it tends to keep whatever levels you have in your body elevated. Welcome to your future, Rockland. Say, how about cracking open a nice plastic bottle of Deer Park for mixing up that baby formula? Why does United Water want this project to go forward so quickly as to necessarily preclude a thorough public education process in which all the variables and all the options can be openly discussed? What if one day you decided you don't like UW anymore and you wished the water utility was still owned by the government and not the private sector, because at least that way through your vote, you could democratically elect new people who would shut the plant down (whereas you can never "vote out" a private corporation from owning the pipes that carry your drinking water)? Let's just say arbitrarily that for the first ten years following completion of this more or less irreversible project there was an average of 500 additional picocuries of tritium per liter showing up in drinking water in Rockland County that was not there before. Even the NRC says Indian Point emits tritium into the ground water and presumably into the Hudson as well, since Hudson water is what flows - 24 hours a day - into and out of the power plant, cooling the atomic reaction that creates electrical power). In 1976 the EPA decided (more or less arbitrarily) that 20,000 picocuries of radioactivity would be roughly the "safe" upper limit for human consumption (due to drinking tritium or any other radionuclide). I say "arbitrarily" because I am aware of no one who has actually tried this since then, to see if it really turned out to be safe. Whose insurance policy would make Rockland homeowners whole again if at some future point tritium (or other radionuclide) levels skyrocketed while property values plummeted? Maybe something so terrible could never, ever happen. I certainly hope it couldn't. But why are we residents the guinea pigs, and how come we pay more - not less - for our water just so UW can do more business and, of course, collect more in utility bills? By the way, Fukushima was also never ever supposed to happen. Human health is not something you go back and study all over again once you realize you've lost it. Doesn't Rockland County have enough cancer already? Dan Rostan Nyack