.
Feedback

Boulders Shut Out In Second Game Against Quebec

Rockland falls 13-0, Velasquez gets loss after working 5 innings.

Game two of the ’ season-opening series in Quebec was one to forget.

The host Capitales rapped out 13 hits in an 13-0 victory. worked five innings and took the loss for Rockland, which fell to 0-2 on the young season.

The teams will play again today and Sunday before the Boulders return to Provident Bank Park in Pomona for their home opener on Tuesday, May 22.

Velasquez looked strong early, retiring six straight – three on strikeouts – after a leadoff walk as the teams were scoreless through two. Quebec broke through with two in the third on the strength of three straight doubles, with Jeff Jelps and Jonathan Malo driving in runs. They added another in the fourth and two in the fifth, sending Velasquez off the hill with a sizeable deficit.

Meanwhile, Capitales starter Karl Gelinas, who was ninth in the Can-Am league in ERA a year ago, had his good stuff throughout, limiting Rockland to just three hits over seven innings. His teammates provided him with two more runs in the sixth and six in the seventh to put the game out of reach. Gelinas stands at 1-0 after the win, while Velasquez falls to 0-1.

When the Boulders get back to Provident Bank Park they will open a six-game homestand that starts against the Newark Bears on Tuesday at 7:05 pm. They will play three games against Newark before hosting the Worcester Tornadoes in a weekend set.

Rockland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 1

Quebec   0 0 2 1 2 2 6 0 x - 13 13 1

2B--S.Clement (1), J.Malo (1), S.Boucher (3), R.Wagner (2), P.Karmas (1), J.Helps (1). HR--J.Peley (1). RBI--J.Malo 2 (3), J.Colafemina (1), S.Boucher 2 (3), R.Wagner 3 (3), J.Peley 3 (4), J.Helps (2). HP--J.Colafemina (1), S.Brown (1). SF--S.Boucher (1), J.Peley (1). SB--J.Malo (1), J.Colafemina (1), S.Brown (1), R.Wagner (1). E--R.Mollica (1), J.Helps (1).

LOB--Rockland 5, Quebec 7.

 

Standings

CanAm W L PCT GB STREAK L10 Quebec 2 0 1.000 - 2W 2-0 Newark 2 0 1.000 - 2W 2-0 New Jersey 1 0 1.000 .5 1W 1-0 Worcester 0 2 0.000 2 2L 0-2 Rockland 0 2 0.000 2 2L 0-2

Next games:
May 19
Worcester @ Newark 6:35pm
Rockland @ Quebec 7:05pm
New Jersey @ K. City 7:05pm

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Gregg May 19, 2012 at 08:53 pm
Good team this season CSL
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
West Nyack June 13, 2013 at 07:03 pm
This issue is not whether Rockland County will need more water in the future which it may nor is itRead More the fact that Hudson River water can be made drinkable which it can. The primary issue is the company that wants to run the project. United Water has been a lousy corporate neighbor to West Nyack allowing old homes to deteriorate then tearing them down and doing nothing to stop the flooding south of the reservoir. If we allow them to construct the Haverstraw project they will do nothing to protect the area and if anything goes wrong they will blame someone else. When United Water starts to take responsibility for its actions and manages their facilities so as to have a minimal impact on the community then maybe they should be allowed to build Haverstraw but don't count on it.
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.