.
Feedback

County Executives: We Want More Info on New TZ Bridge

Officials' request for details on new span postpones important vote

State and federal officials cannot move ahead with the without county politicians' vote—and this week, county leaders said they want more information before filling out their ballots.

Rockland County Executive C. Scott Vanderhoef, Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino and Putnam County Executive MaryEllen Odell are members of the The New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC), a nine-member group that is critical in moving the project forward.

A vote that would include the crossing in NYMTC's Regional Transportation Plan was slated for Tuesday of this week, but Vanderhoef, Astorino and Odell said they want to see the project's Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) before voting, according to NYMTC's website.

The FEIS document is due out in a matter of weeks; the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) , and addressed issues like wildlife implications and land acquisition.  

County executives noted they want more information on issues like the price-tag and transportation details.

"We haven't seen the design proposal, and don't have details on the financing," said Susan Cerra, a spokesperson for Vanderhoef.

"The decision to postpone the vote was just common sense," Astorino said. "The FEIS is due shortly. Why would we have a vote before seeing what's in it?" 

"I have said from the beginning, we need to build the bridge but we need to do it right," he added. "Getting as much information up front will pay big dividends in terms of building a bridge that’s affordable and meets the present and future needs of Westchester, the region, our state and our nation."

No new date for the vote has been set.

Watchdog July 6, 2012 at 01:08 am
I heard Vanderhoef plans to include income from tolls in this years budget to supplement the income from red light cameras which fell short the last few years. You say, how can he do that since the bridge is not yet built and the County would not get any toll income anyway? Aha ha, guess what, there are no red light cameras either and we let him get away with that???
MitchP July 6, 2012 at 03:38 am
How much bridge can we get for $1 billion? Just curious.
Maggie24 July 6, 2012 at 11:17 am
<snort> Better late than never, Vanderhoef.
It is inconceivable to me that we are about to spend any money whatsoever building a Twentieth Century bridge for the Twenty-First Century. There should be NO new spans across or under the Hudson, in any form, that do not include mass transit. Why must we continue to spew carbon monoxide into the air, needlessly?? Rockland is the seventh-wealthiest county in the US. Our tax dollars are funding projects throughout the state and the country. It's time we got some of those taxes back, in the form of mass transit on this bridge. It's good for the skies, it's good for the residents, it's good for the future. No mass transit? No bridge!!
Chris July 6, 2012 at 04:55 pm
this bridge construction is going to go private enterprise. mark my words(not that its a bad thing)... with the trillions of dollars being spent by washington and the billions of dollars spent and wasted by the state. You would think they could piece together some bucks for an important transportation artery like this one.. Juust political grand standing
Chris July 6, 2012 at 04:58 pm
oh and another point about federal spending... Building bridges and roads is the duty and proper function of a government. When the government gets involved and starts paying for peoples housing, food etc (welfare and entitlements) there is no money to help the general populace.. with project like a new TZ bridge
Joe July 6, 2012 at 10:26 pm
All I want for Christmas is my home to be eminant domained.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
West Nyack June 13, 2013 at 07:03 pm
This issue is not whether Rockland County will need more water in the future which it may nor is itRead More the fact that Hudson River water can be made drinkable which it can. The primary issue is the company that wants to run the project. United Water has been a lousy corporate neighbor to West Nyack allowing old homes to deteriorate then tearing them down and doing nothing to stop the flooding south of the reservoir. If we allow them to construct the Haverstraw project they will do nothing to protect the area and if anything goes wrong they will blame someone else. When United Water starts to take responsibility for its actions and manages their facilities so as to have a minimal impact on the community then maybe they should be allowed to build Haverstraw but don't count on it.
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.