.
Feedback

RNC Dispatch: Local Delegates Cheer Romney

Politicos from Rockland, Westchester, Putnam sound off on Republican National Convention happenings

In more ways than one, Tuesday night was the linchpin moment of the Republican National Convention in Tampa Bay, FL.

The first day due to , Tuesday evening housed an official GOP nomination of Mitt Romney for president—and a stirring speech by his wife, Ann.

Sen. Greg Ball (R,C - Patterson) was on the convention floor when Romney snagged the party's nomination. The former Massachusetts governor earned the required delegate votes with ease, securing his place on November's ballot alongside vice presidential hopeful congressman Paul Ryan.

"There's a real energy that exists," Ball told Patch Wednesday morning. "It's a great convention."

Romney's nomination left many Ron Paul supporters with a sour taste, however—not due to Romney's landslide nomination victory, but because what many perceived as a calculated snub. RNC officials refused to repeat the number of delegates Paul received when reciting each state's vote tally.

Ball said he crossed paths with a handful of perturbed Paul followers.

"We've got to come together as Independents, Moderates, Republicans and Conservatives," he said, stressing the importance of party unity. "We have to take on Obama, and take back the country on solid footing."

On the heels of Romney's nomination were a spate of speeches from notable GOP members, including acerbic New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and once-presidential hopeful Rick Santorum.

But Ann Romney—with a proclamation on her husband's character, and tales of her battles with cancer and MS—was undoubtedly the capstone. Her speech left many Republicans, and some newscasters, teary-eyed.

"Ann Romney was a real rock star," Ball said. "[She] connected well with the crowd and, I believe, America."

Ball supplied his 4,000 Facebook page followers with live updates and photographs Tuesday night.

"She is amazing," he wrote during Ann Romney's moment on stage. "That's a first lady. What a great person."

Rockland delegate Vincent Reda, chairman of the county's Republican Committee, that he and other local delegates are ready for business.

Rockland County executive C. Scott Vanderhoef was in Tampa Bay Monday, but .

Paul Ryan is slated to deliver his speech Wednesday night.

--

For more Patch stories from reporters on the ground in Tampa Bay, see:

13 Protesters Booted from Innisbrook After Marco Rubio Heckled

Newt U is Now in Session

Lack of RNC Crowds Upsets Tampa Business Owners

What Are RNC Visitors Saying About Tampa Bay?

Blaue Vogel August 30, 2012 at 12:43 am
He's not the nominee and a golden opportunity to attack Obama's failed presidency was lost. Electrifying? Not even close.
Watchdog August 30, 2012 at 01:17 am
AND the ClintonTeam, including dare I say it RICH pal Terry Mac Aullife were brimming with pride when they put OBAMA on the Podium in 2004.HE of course was very thankful and showed his thanks by tearing Hillary apart. She will be a no show at this convention for fear of flashbacks.
Watchdog August 30, 2012 at 01:20 am
AND where is Al Gore? A little Private Equity going on Ally boy?
Watchdog August 30, 2012 at 01:22 am
BREAKING NEWS. Chevvy Volt has stopped production for a while. No one wants it.
Watchdog August 30, 2012 at 01:27 am
In some cases there is no room for smoke.
Watchdog August 30, 2012 at 03:14 am
Put a fork in him....OBAMA is done.......LANDSLIDE.....REAGAN IS WATCHING.
Will McAvoy August 30, 2012 at 03:25 am
Obamas has to campaign so hard because he knows there are no jobs out there if he loses and he would be unemployed like many other Americans.
Aidan August 30, 2012 at 11:17 am
After last night ... I think you're right. Ain't gonna be close. At all.
Blaue Vogel August 30, 2012 at 11:50 am
Its not even close to being over. Don't underestimate the left, the media, and their collective sleazy tactics. The Republicans need to stay on Paul Ryan's message. He was awesome last night.
Billy L August 30, 2012 at 12:38 pm
Got love the distractions...where are Mitt's tax returns? He released 2 years and gets vilified meanwhile your boy, your hero Jimmy Carter only released 1...his tax return for 1975. I smell a double standard...
Of course they need these distractions...what is Obama going to do? Run on his record? LOL
Constitutionalist Mom August 30, 2012 at 02:02 pm
WE DID BUILD THIS!!! His "you didn't build that business" comment was Dear Leader Chairman MaoBama's downfall. Nail in his coffin if you will!! That will be a pivotal and defining moment!! I am not happy with the ticket but I'd rather have some R&R than some socialist who has no clue what the fabric of our foundation was and IS based upon!! Not to mention BO has never held a job in the private sector at all and has no prior knowledge of how to manage, lead or make decisions (case in point: took him months to decide give the go ahead to kill Osama. Valerie Jarrett talked him out of it several times!!). He has never had to be held accountable for his inefficiencies and inept competency.
TTH August 30, 2012 at 04:39 pm
One huge difference between Romney and Obama is Romney is used to signing the front of checks and the only thing Obama has ever done is sign the back of checks!!
Dan Seidel August 30, 2012 at 05:06 pm
while you were sleeping, and speaking of Freedom of Speech, Pam Geller and Robert Spencer with Horowitz and Yerushalmi win one for America!! HEROES!!!!! WINTER SOLDIERS !!!!!
MTA ADVERTISEMENTS STAY - 1ST AMENDMENT WIN!!! "...Always side with the civilized man against the savages". NOBAMA IN 2012!!! http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/righteous-indignation-ny-judge-excoriates-nyc-mta-in-afdi-free-speech-ruling.html
Aidan August 30, 2012 at 05:18 pm
An instant classic post.
Mike August 30, 2012 at 05:37 pm
Your sure he signs checks...thought it was more like a promissory note :)
Mike August 30, 2012 at 05:40 pm
Since they will not post this on the Coe blog, let me try it here:Let me try my post again (apparently my first one did not pass the censors although there was no TOS violation). Nothing was taken out of context. Mr. Obama said the words "you did not build it". This is a fact. What is not a fact, but a complete fabrication is the Obama ad that accuses Romney of allowing an employee's wife of Bain to die beacsue he lost a job and had no insurance. Only after many in his own party decried the ad, did Obama distance himself from it. So please stop with this out of context defense. Btw, here is the proof: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-romney-not-responsible-death-woman-political-ad-192444561.html
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) August 30, 2012 at 05:54 pm
@ Aidan: Interesting take on Ann Romney's moment in the spotlight; I thought her speech went over well.
What was unfortunate: Ann Romney said 'love' is the most important sentiment... but a few minutes later, when Christie took the podium, he stressed that respect is more important that love.
Michael Ruschak August 30, 2012 at 05:55 pm
Electrifying? More like electrilying. RYAN: Said Obama misled people in Ryan’s hometown of Janesville, Wis., by making them think a General Motors plant there threatened with closure could be saved. "A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, candidate Obama said: ’I believe that if our government is there to support you ... this plant will be here for another hundred years.’ That’s what he said in 2008. Well, as it turned out, that plant didn’t last another year."
THE FACTS: The plant halted production in December 2008, weeks before Obama took office and well before he enacted a more robust auto industry bailout that rescued GM and Chrysler and allowed the majority of their plants — though not the Janesville facility — to stay in operation. Ryan himself voted for an auto bailout under President George W. Bush that was designed to help GM, but he was a vocal critic of the one pushed through by Obama that has been widely credited with revitalizing both GM and Chrysler. Landslide indeed.
Aidan August 30, 2012 at 06:14 pm
How many billions of taxpayer dollars are still owed by those companies? And never a discussion about those who got screwed ... while the unions drew a pass ,.. by the Obama auto bailout?
Aidan August 30, 2012 at 06:17 pm
Kevin, Ann is a wife and mother ... Christie is a politician. Everyone has different glasses.
Mike August 30, 2012 at 07:36 pm
Michael- Mr. Ryan is correct. Here is the proof: http://gazettextra.com/news/2009/apr/21/thursday-last-day-production-isuzu-line-comes-end/
It is really a sad state of affairs when Dem leaders and party apparatchiks resort to these tactics. The bottom line is under this POTUS we are in one of the longest and highest sustained level of official unemployment in our country's history. If we counted real unemployment- those underemployed and those who have given up, the percentage is into the teens. This POTUS promised that if we spent all this money on stimukus unemployment would come down. We spent and unemployment is up, gas prices are up, are people are afraid. Sorry Mike, in my scorecard, thats a F.
Michael Ruschak August 30, 2012 at 09:03 pm
You paste articles, I paste articles too.
http://factcheck.org/2012/08/ryans-vp-spin/ http://cbsn.ws/PuUZIC http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/30/paul-ryans-speech-in-three-words/ http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics /view/20120830fact_check_paul_ryan_takes_factual_shortcuts_in_speech
John Taggart August 30, 2012 at 09:26 pm
I always have to bring this FACT up when talking about the auto bailouts....Obama required the unions of the bailed out car companies to GIVE UP THEIR RIGHT TO STRIKE. and they did it. The only US car company whos workers have a right to strike for better conditions without fear of being fired is Ford because they took no tarp... Obama is a union buster hiding behind corrupt union managment, the workers ,especially in construction, count for nothing but their vote is all but demanded
John Taggart August 30, 2012 at 09:28 pm
Saved Chrysler by throwing tax money at it and selling it to Fiat ?
Mike August 31, 2012 at 12:07 am
These are not news sites. These are opinions. Factcheck.org is owned by a liberal leaning think tank and has been called to task by NPR for not exactly being non partisan. The site i providedto disprove the false fact check jumped onby the Obama inspired MSM in fact is from the local newspaperin WI wherethe plant is located. If they have a story saying the last car thst came offthe line in that plant was in 2009, then you can keep on pasting butit is notgoing to change the fact.
Michael Ruschak August 31, 2012 at 02:16 pm
The decision to close the plant was made before the President took office.
Michael Ruschak August 31, 2012 at 04:52 pm
CBS NEWS website, Fox NEWS website and the Boston Herald online are not news sites? And you're telling me NPR is a credible news source and not the "lamestream media" to you?
Mike August 31, 2012 at 05:01 pm
FACT: plant CLOSED June 2009
FACT: Obama is POTUS Jan 2009 FACT: June is after Jan FACT: Ryan is correct
Mike August 31, 2012 at 05:08 pm
http://www.jsonline.com/business/130171578.html?ipad=y
http://gazettextra.com/news/2009/feb/19/gm-plant-last-day-finalized/ Why would a local paper indicate the plsnt closed in 2009 (story written in 2009) long before Ryan was on ticket? You see when you fsct check correctly, you need to remove bias and go directly to the local source.
Michael Ruschak August 31, 2012 at 06:37 pm
Wait a second.From your JS article:
"Since they were shut down in 2009, both the Janesville and Tennessee plants have been on standby status, meaning they were not producing vehicles, but they were not completely shut down." Stand by is not shut down is it? And from Gazz: "The UAW was seeking a commitment from the company to add jobs and reopen idled plants as part of talks on a new four-year contract. A local task force, however, hopes that can all be avoided. The group is lobbying the automaker to award Janesville a different product." Pesky things those facts. So go ahead and explain why stand by and shut down are the same thing or some such nonsense. I'm not going to waste any more time with your spin.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.
drostan June 19, 2013 at 03:13 pm
A Response to the Response Mr. Michael Pointing, writing on behalf of United Water, opined in theRead More Journal News (June 7) and the Nyack Patch (June 11) that an Issues Conference on the pending desalination project is unnecessary. When it is so greatly to his personal and professional benefit to support this project, how can he expect to be taken seriously? Comments on the "desal" plant have only rarely mentioned that the radioactive tritium, which each day leaks into the Hudson from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant - just 3 miles upstream from the plant - will end up, in diluted form, in our drinking water. Problem is, although highly diluted, there's no way to filter out tritium since it is chemically identical to water. Worse, there's no known safe exposure level. Like "normal" water, tritium goes into your body as fast as you drink it. Good news: about half of the tritium you do drink is filtered out by the kidneys within about ten days. Bad news: When your kitchen faucet keeps providing you with small amounts of tritium day after day, it tends to keep whatever levels you have in your body elevated. Welcome to your future, Rockland. Say, how about cracking open a nice plastic bottle of Deer Park for mixing up that baby formula? Why does United Water want this project to go forward so quickly as to necessarily preclude a thorough public education process in which all the variables and all the options can be openly discussed? What if one day you decided you don't like UW anymore and you wished the water utility was still owned by the government and not the private sector, because at least that way through your vote, you could democratically elect new people who would shut the plant down (whereas you can never "vote out" a private corporation from owning the pipes that carry your drinking water)? Let's just say arbitrarily that for the first ten years following completion of this more or less irreversible project there was an average of 500 additional picocuries of tritium per liter showing up in drinking water in Rockland County that was not there before. Even the NRC says Indian Point emits tritium into the ground water and presumably into the Hudson as well, since Hudson water is what flows - 24 hours a day - into and out of the power plant, cooling the atomic reaction that creates electrical power). In 1976 the EPA decided (more or less arbitrarily) that 20,000 picocuries of radioactivity would be roughly the "safe" upper limit for human consumption (due to drinking tritium or any other radionuclide). I say "arbitrarily" because I am aware of no one who has actually tried this since then, to see if it really turned out to be safe. Whose insurance policy would make Rockland homeowners whole again if at some future point tritium (or other radionuclide) levels skyrocketed while property values plummeted? Maybe something so terrible could never, ever happen. I certainly hope it couldn't. But why are we residents the guinea pigs, and how come we pay more - not less - for our water just so UW can do more business and, of course, collect more in utility bills? By the way, Fukushima was also never ever supposed to happen. Human health is not something you go back and study all over again once you realize you've lost it. Doesn't Rockland County have enough cancer already? Dan Rostan Nyack