.

Weho Mayor: Rainbow Crosswalks Are Branding Investment

Jeffrey Prang explains why the city spent $67,000 to make the colored crosswalks permanent.

After rumblings within the West Hollywood community that a $67,000 price tag was too steep for the rainbow crosswalks installed at the intersection of Santa Monica and San Vicente boulevards, Mayor Jeffrey Prang defended the payment.

“The money that was put into those crosswalks is an investment in the branding and marketing of West Hollywood,” Prang said. “This is a project that has received enormously positive media attention. It is something that speaks to the heart and soul of what West Hollywood is. These things have great symbolic relevance to a lot of people in the community.”

Completed Friday, the crosswalks are located in Weho’s Boystown neighborhood. They were made popular during Gay Pride Month in July. The council voted in August to spend $67,000 to make them permanent using thermo-plastic technology.

Prang said that while painting crosswalks may seem simple in nature, the process of making the city’s colored crosswalks was more complex.

“If you look at the material, it is a hard plastic. It’s thick as a shingle,” Prang said. “It is a thermal plastic being melted onto the concrete. The color will never fade. It’s not something that can be done by a local artist with water-based paint.”

According to Prang, a normal crosswalk costs around $35,000 and is expected to last for five to seven years before it requires a touch-up. He said that in this case, the rainbow crosswalks are estimated to last for 12 to 15 years before they need serious attention.

City Councilman John D'Amico, in response to questions regarding the price of the crosswalks, offered to speak to concerned residents and gave out his cellular phone number in the comments section of a previous Patch article.

When asked if the money could have been spent on other city issues, D'Amico responded, “Of course.”

“Government is about priorities. We very carefully divide up and appropriate the dollars we have in the right categories, such as the millions of dollars we spend on social services,” D'Amico said. “There’s always different ways to think about spending money. The more nuanced answer from my point of view is that we’re spending that money in the right way.”

D'Amico agreed with Prang that Boystown’s vitality is key to the success of West Hollywood as an important destination for the gay and lesbian community.

“It’s gotten us a lot of press and it has helped people think again about what this part of West Hollywood means,” D'Amico said.

Be sure to follow West Hollywood Patch on Twitter and "Like" us on Facebook.

Stephanie October 10, 2012 at 09:26 PM
CHECK OUT PHOTOS 2,3 and 4 AT THE TOP OF THIS STORY, TAKEN 2 DAYS AFTER "OPENING" Temporary Paint: $13,000.00 Permanent Paint: $67,000.00 Skid Marks Defacing the Symbol of Equality: No charge The chance to say "We told you so", PRICELESS.
Stephanie October 10, 2012 at 09:27 PM
@90069 - Maybe not such a good idea after all. CHECK OUT PHOTOS 2,3 and 4 AT THE TOP OF THIS STORY, TAKEN 2 DAYS AFTER "OPENING" Temporary Paint: $13,000.00 Permanent Paint: $67,000.00 Skid Marks Defacing the Symbol of Equality: No charge The chance to say "We told you so", PRICELESS.
me October 11, 2012 at 06:33 AM
YES!!!!....cannot agree more...d'amico states "“Government is about priorities"......WHAT????....THIS is a priority????.....i can think of at least 30 other things that this money could have been put to better use for than this BS....some articles have claimed that we're getting tons of press around the world.....a simple google search doesn't bring much up at all.....TOTAL WASTE!!!....and already DEFACED!!!!......time for ALL of the city council to be voted out....
joninla November 01, 2012 at 02:52 AM
I noticed the same, which the new permanent 'not so bright and colorful' permanent rainbow crosswalk was almost invisible on the east end due to the black tire marks. I just don't think it was intentional, but rather an attempt to turn so fast as to cut in front of a pedestrian (though I haven't checked the police blotter, I hope nobody was hurt .... but then again we could rename the intersection as the Amanda Bynes Danger zone ... lol).
joninla November 01, 2012 at 02:58 AM
@Stephanie - I formally have changed my opinion which left us 'agreeing to disagree' The permanent paint/colors/stripes look nothing like the original Pride Painting - which I still contend was actually a safety improvement for pedestrians. The ugly, non-colorful, non-rainbow-looking is neither good enough to meet the City Defending it as a "City Branding". Zero branding from the final mess. And the new design/color is not only no more safe for pedestrians, but as the black tire marks now obscuring much of the crosswalk, I think it is more dangerous for pedestrians. So .... We now agree on the 'stupid' rainbow crosswalk. :)

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »