.
Feedback

Piermont Trustees Meet First Time Since Storm

They talked storm response, especially for local businesses

The Piermont Board of Trustees held their first meeting since Superstorm Sandy Tuesday night at Village Hall and discussed storm aftermath as well as issues to prepare for future storms.

One of the village building inspectors, Charlie Schaub, estimated that more than 80 percent of residents have their power back as of Tuesday night. He said they’re going to put a lot of focus on getting businesses back up in the coming days.


In regards to businesses, Mayor Chris Sanders said the trustees are working on organizing a meeting to be held at Village Hall on Monday for local businesses from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. He said they’re working on getting representatives from FEMA, Small Business Administration, Hudson Valley Economic Development, Rockland County Industrial Development Agency and possibly Empire State Marine Trades Association to attend the meeting.

“We’re just generally hoping to have a bunch of those loan people set up here and bring people here and make that available for both Piermont businesses, as well as Nyack businesses,” Sanders said.

He added that he has been in contact with Nyack Mayor Jen Laird-White, who offered what Sanders called an interesting idea for how to help some Piermont businesses that saw a lot of damage from the storm.

“There are open storefronts in Nyack, so she’s offering that perhaps working with their chamber that if a Piermont business wants to open up a popup for a month or if a restaurant wants to open up for a period of time, that might be an interesting thing to explore,” Sanders said.

He added that that idea is just something they might look into and acknowledged there are a “whole host of issues” that could complicate matters.

Sanders said the village is also working to try and get a FEMA team to the village. He also said moving forward, they might need to go over zoning issues and think about the types of buildings they allow in the village. He added they might have to look into putting new buildings on stilts so flood water can pass under them.

The trustees also discussed rebuilding seawalls that were damaged in the storm. Sanders said they would like the Army Corps of Engineers to provide standards for how the seawalls should be built so they can pass those onto residents.

One issue with rebuilding seawalls that came up is that a lot of them are on private property and only on that property. The trustees said if a few residents who live next to each other can agree to build intertwining sea walls, that could help against possible flooding issues.

“It’s going to be a chore and an ordeal, but if they intertwine they’re going to be an awful lot stronger,” said Trustee John Gallucci Jr.

“It’s in their interests as well.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.
drostan June 19, 2013 at 03:13 pm
A Response to the Response Mr. Michael Pointing, writing on behalf of United Water, opined in theRead More Journal News (June 7) and the Nyack Patch (June 11) that an Issues Conference on the pending desalination project is unnecessary. When it is so greatly to his personal and professional benefit to support this project, how can he expect to be taken seriously? Comments on the "desal" plant have only rarely mentioned that the radioactive tritium, which each day leaks into the Hudson from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant - just 3 miles upstream from the plant - will end up, in diluted form, in our drinking water. Problem is, although highly diluted, there's no way to filter out tritium since it is chemically identical to water. Worse, there's no known safe exposure level. Like "normal" water, tritium goes into your body as fast as you drink it. Good news: about half of the tritium you do drink is filtered out by the kidneys within about ten days. Bad news: When your kitchen faucet keeps providing you with small amounts of tritium day after day, it tends to keep whatever levels you have in your body elevated. Welcome to your future, Rockland. Say, how about cracking open a nice plastic bottle of Deer Park for mixing up that baby formula? Why does United Water want this project to go forward so quickly as to necessarily preclude a thorough public education process in which all the variables and all the options can be openly discussed? What if one day you decided you don't like UW anymore and you wished the water utility was still owned by the government and not the private sector, because at least that way through your vote, you could democratically elect new people who would shut the plant down (whereas you can never "vote out" a private corporation from owning the pipes that carry your drinking water)? Let's just say arbitrarily that for the first ten years following completion of this more or less irreversible project there was an average of 500 additional picocuries of tritium per liter showing up in drinking water in Rockland County that was not there before. Even the NRC says Indian Point emits tritium into the ground water and presumably into the Hudson as well, since Hudson water is what flows - 24 hours a day - into and out of the power plant, cooling the atomic reaction that creates electrical power). In 1976 the EPA decided (more or less arbitrarily) that 20,000 picocuries of radioactivity would be roughly the "safe" upper limit for human consumption (due to drinking tritium or any other radionuclide). I say "arbitrarily" because I am aware of no one who has actually tried this since then, to see if it really turned out to be safe. Whose insurance policy would make Rockland homeowners whole again if at some future point tritium (or other radionuclide) levels skyrocketed while property values plummeted? Maybe something so terrible could never, ever happen. I certainly hope it couldn't. But why are we residents the guinea pigs, and how come we pay more - not less - for our water just so UW can do more business and, of course, collect more in utility bills? By the way, Fukushima was also never ever supposed to happen. Human health is not something you go back and study all over again once you realize you've lost it. Doesn't Rockland County have enough cancer already? Dan Rostan Nyack