.
Feedback

Orangetown: No Decision Yet on Police Raises

Town lawmakers mull five-year contract with progressively higher pay increases

Orangetown lawmakers did not reach a final decision about contracts with the at Tuesday's board meeting, but noted rising costs are presenting a problem for the town.

Supervisor Andy Stewart and other board members are with the Rockland County Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association (PBA) that would retroactively implement 2.25 percent raises for 2011.

Going forward, town police would see a 2.25 percent raise for 2012, 2.35 percent raise for 2013, 2.45 percent raise for 2014 and 2.50 percent raise for 2015. Benefits would remain the same, officials noted.

"It costs more and more every year," Stewart said. "It's not really an affordable solution."

Three local lawmakers—Tom Diviny, Denis Troy and Paul Valentine—have already signed off on the agreement.

Stewart said the town is calling on New York State to mend the way arbitration is carried out. Currently, the PBA looks to neighboring towns and bases their numbers partially on that.

"Local governments have to have more latitude to negotiate," Stewart said.

Still, the final vote remains weeks out.

"That agreement would not be ready for a final decision next week, as we thought it might be," he said, noting one lawmaker will be absent, and citing other reasons, as well.

Stewart noted police are crucial to the town—"we have low crime rate, and we want to keep it that way," he said—but rising costs are a burden on taxpayers.

"Our hands are tied as a community and as taxpayers," Valentine said.

"We would rather have 90 or 100 police officers in a program we can afford, but unfortunately we're going to have fewer and fewer officers as the budget gets crunched," Stewart added.

Mike June 7, 2012 at 06:01 pm
Maureen- I'm on the same page as you. Believe me though I dont want to see people lose jobs and I believe that the OPD does great work. I assume we need the staffing at a certain level so layoffs to me are never the best first answer. I would hope that the Union would agree to reasonable increases- what the Town has offered is more than reasonable- it would not be my offer. All I am saying is fix this arbitration nonsense because if you dont then yes, I believe what you have said - reduction in the workforce- is the only viable option left.
Ed Olsen June 7, 2012 at 06:10 pm
I Agree with Maureen !! Bravo !! But now we are going to be pulled over and targeted !! My parents raised 9 kids in orangetown and a year after they retired they said we can not afford to live here and moved to Florida what a shame.
Andy Stewart, Orangetown Supervisor June 7, 2012 at 06:11 pm
Mr. Olsen, as you can see from Paul V's comment and my own as expressed in the newspaper, reasonable people can and will definitely disagree on the PBA contract settlement. My feeling is that even if the arbitrator gives the Town a worse deal than the PBA is currently offering, it will only be for two years (2011 and 2012) and we can keep trying for a better deal. Since the County is killing us with "charge-backs" for tuition and elections, etc., the Town's bargaining position will improve as our financial situation worsens (how's that for looking on the bright side?). But I understand Paul's view, which is shared, more or less, with other members of the Town Board (Diviny, Troy). It is not an unreasonable position, given the predicament we are in.
Maureen June 7, 2012 at 06:30 pm
Andy. Then shut Blue Hill and Broadacres today!! Tell those who want to golf there at taxpayers expense (both golf courses lose money and are being supported by tax dollars) that since the police want more recreation gets less! Give me a break - play some hardball until someone's ox gets gored! It's the police or golf. Town Board make up your minds. I'm not supporting both with my tax dollars!!!!
Paul W. Valentine June 7, 2012 at 08:03 pm
Maureen, The P.B.A. is fully aware that we have a budget to live with-in and the increase very well may result in lay-offs or not filling positions of officers that retire. The police force has been decreased over the last number of years from a high of around 106 to its current low of around 86. Our first responsibility is to insure public safety. By the way we do not make money on any of the recreation in the town and Veterans Park cost us as much to maintain as the golf course. Would you like to eliminate baseball, softball , soccer at the same time. Get real, these recreations are what make us such a great town to live in. While I agree we have to live with in our means and stand our ground, we have to do it with common sense and use a scapel and not a slege hammer!
Maureen June 7, 2012 at 08:34 pm
Paul:
Thank you for your reply.  I am offering you support to get tough.  Let's change "very well may result in lay-offs" to "will result in lay-offs".    Orangetown is not "Dodge City".  Take the police force down to 80 as a first step.    As to "getting real" you have two golf courses subsidized by taxpayers. One has 27 holes the other 9.   Eliminate the 9 hole one and make the other one profitable.  Use the money saved elsewhere.   As to "while I agree we have to live within our means" clearly the PBA is NOT living within the taxpayers "means" and that is my "common sense".  So do it whatever way you want with a scalpel, sledge hammer or screwdriver just so the taxpayers don't continue to be "screwed".     The public is tired of rising taxes.  You have our support.  Stop advising me on what you believe is "common sense".  My "common sense" says you do not need Broadacres if you have Blue Hill and it is not overrun with golfers.  But talk to Mr Troy about this - he's the one that calls Broadacres an "asset" and bought that "jewel".   You were elected to find solutions to rising taxes  - we are broke - the County is broke and the cops want more cash?  The ones who need a break are the taxpayers and the ones who need to "get real" are those who sit on the Town Board. Off you go now and get down to it instead of whining about what is out of your control.  The only control we have right now is whether to re-elect you or not at the next election!
Ed Olsen June 7, 2012 at 09:39 pm
So sad !! Rockland County raises our taxes 30% than adds 4% energy tax at the same time my and all taxpayers homes value keeps going down !! But our taxes keep going up !! something has to give !! We in general are a Law abiding comunity we do not need so many cops !! and if extra are needed some times hire retired NYPD to fill in for special functions. I am a business owner also and pay taxes to Nyack and Clarkstown also, Where is our Scott Walker to save all the local goverments.
Brian Goudie June 7, 2012 at 11:21 pm
It all boils down to whether or not Stewart, Valentine and the rest of the board have the guts to do what needs to be done (a la Governor Walker in Wisconsin) or whether they are going to go along to get along like every other elected official before them and lead us further down the road to disaster. It is not for nothing that New York State has lost 3 million residents in the last 10 years. We have yet to see leaders with the strenght of character to tell the truth and start shrinking the size of governemnt instead of limp wristed efforts to reduce its rate of growth.
Ed Olsen June 8, 2012 at 12:11 am
Right on Brian !!
Brian Goudie June 8, 2012 at 12:21 am
It all boils down to whether or not Stewart, Valentine and the rest of the board have the guts to do what needs to be done (a la Governor Walker in Wisconsin) or whether they are going to go along to get along like every other elected official before them and lead us further down the road to disaster. It is not for nothing that New York State has lost 3 million residents in the last 10 years. We have yet to see leaders with the strength of character to tell the truth and start shrinking the size of governemnt instead of limp wristed efforts to reduce its rate of growth.
Paul W. Valentine June 8, 2012 at 01:02 am
First and foremost, I was extremely excited by Governor Scott Walker's victory as it shows the turning tide for America. I agree with the sentiments of your posts and would like to ensure you that we're on the right path. The fact of the matter is that we can either accept the average annual percentage salary increase of 2.36% over 5 years, or allow an arbitrator to compare the surrounding Rockland towns and create their own contract. Considering Clarkstown has higher base salary and received a 5 year deal at 2.5% per year, and Ramapo received a larger increase, I firmly believe that at this moment it is better for the taxpayers to accept the deal. At the same time, however, we have been attacking the root of the problem, which is the unfair bargaining position created by the Taylor Law, which prevents the police from striking in exchange for mandating binding arbitration in the case of contract disputes. We have done so by sending a memorializing resolution to the state governor and government calling for reformation of the Taylor Law so we have a chance of bringing these contracts under control.These changes will not come about before this contract is settled either by arbitration or negotiation. I will post the entire text of this memorialization in a follow-up to this current post. In closing, I want to ensure you that I will do everything possible to solve our growing tax burden, and no options are off the table. I appreciate your suggestions and urge you to continue
Mike June 8, 2012 at 01:05 am
Interesting statistic: while the number of officers has declined over past several years, so has the "crime rate" in O'TOWN.
Paul W. Valentine June 8, 2012 at 01:06 am
the dialogue, and feel free to write me with any specific solutions you may come up with to help the situation. I am open to suggestion and care to keep you all in the loop and fully explain my actions. Unfortunately, I will be in away for the next week and will be unable to continue this discussion at this time. I will, however, read any follow-ups, or your emails to pvalentine@orangetown.com as soon as I am back. Together we will restore Rockland to the level of prosperity we are used to.
Paul W. Valentine June 8, 2012 at 01:08 am
In regards to the resolution, I am unable to fit it into a post on this website. However, it is available for your reference at the Orangetown town website.
Robert Naan June 8, 2012 at 01:14 am
Paul, in order to really understand the dilemma you are in, means you have to do your homework on the way the binding arbitration process works. The Haverstraw Police Department and Orangetown Police Department were the last two town police forces in Rockland County not to give out percentage raises based on years of service. (Longevity Pay) That was until the last arbitration we had up here in North Rockland.
Not only did the PBA get over 3% raises; those with over 20 years of service got an additional pay raise of of close to ten percent. Now this "longevity" pay goes up with every raise the Town or the Arbitrator gives them.The Haverstraw PBA is still fighting to get the longevity pay that Clarkstown PBA has which totals 16% additional pay if you have 20 years of service. That is close to $30,000 dollars per PBA member. Who lost by the Town Board taking a tough stance. We, the taxpayers did!!!! The likelihood of this eventually being imposed on Orangetown via an arbitrator will happen sooner than later. Comparing them to other PD's in the County will lead to this potential financially devastating decision. As long as Sheldon Silver is still running New York State, this will never change. Tough choice Paul. Many who don't understand the process will never comprehend the bind you are in. Can't kick the can down the road and blame the process! Just ask us here in North Rockland how great our last arbitration battle went. Good luck.
Mike June 8, 2012 at 01:14 am
Appreciate your reply and I understand and agree with the logic employed even though it is difficult to swallow. I look forward to reading what has been sent to the Governor and other state officials asking them to modify the arbitration process. I would further ask when you return or perhaps one of your colleagues can provide the taxpayers with appropriate contacts at the state for an all out letter writing campaign or petition drive asking that the process be modified. It appears to me to be a simple fix which would be to take into consideration NYC and the NYPD salaries in the arbitration process. As has been alluded to above, in the meantime, in order to keep the budget reasonable and taxes palatable, the Town will need to manage the size of the OPD very carefully during the next several years.
Andrew Wiley June 8, 2012 at 02:17 am
New York State borrowed $59 billion, Rockland County wants to bond $95 million, and last year a majority Orangetown elected officials voted to bond monies for police pension contributions over several years. Within 10 years Orangetown has increased bond debt from $8 million to over $80 million dollars. Recreation is important to many residents in Orangetown. We spent $7 million dollars on ball fileds which passed in a vote.Our residents had a choice to vote for or against bonding this money. I understand the need to have cost certainity for police contracts. In the next five years we will see more cuts from federal,state, and county governments. Federal and state government will continue to increase unfunded mandates that town residents will be forced to asorb. The world economy is not in good shape and we are going to have to work together to solve our spending and debt problems that face our country at all levels of government. I respect the work of Orangetown Police and know they work hard to keep Orangetown safe. They live in our town and have families that they raise in our town. Many of the officers grew up here in Orangetown. The police are a asset to our town and deserve many of benefits they bargain for in contract negotiations. Our town finances can not support increases at the same time revenue decreases.In good faith the Town should work towards a contract that is good for all parties. I believe we should limit any negotiated contract to no more than two years.
Maureen June 8, 2012 at 02:59 am
I look forward to the day when Kevin Nulty steps up to the plate and tells the PBA that the police will forgo any salary increase for the next two years because "they live in our town, and have families that they raise in our town".
I don't have anything like the benefits they have. Yes the police are an "asset" but this asset is also a huge "liability". Sorry but I want the OPD downsized. If the greedy want more then let them watch some of their brethern collect unemployment benefits. I did once! They don't "bargain" - they wait out the process until the Town caves in or the arbitrators cave in. Let's have a referendum: Do you ... a) Want to raise taxes every year to pay the police more or b) Keep taxes constant and downsize the OPD accordingly And stop offering as a solution to kick the can down the road for two years. There needs to be a stand on this issue now. Negotiate with the PBA how many cops we need to lay off to keep the budget neutral. .
Brian Goudie June 8, 2012 at 09:38 am
The people who protest against austerity, or think it’s a tragedy when a servce is cut due to budget constraints, are really missing the larger point: the sooner this house of cards collapses, the better off we’ll all be.
Brian Goudie June 8, 2012 at 09:53 am
Talk vs. Action: Example 1:
Everytime the police setup a check point along a local road to look for expired drivers' registrations, the police officers doing it ARE PAID OVERTIME. Why? This is a no- brainer. Why should the public be asked to pay overtime wages to have their registrations checked? No business employing workers during the normal daytime working hours would do this. Yet the police dictate that it must be so,,, and our elected officials just go along to get along. It takes guts to make change. Let's see some guts for a change.
Brian Goudie June 8, 2012 at 09:55 am
"The Wisconsin vote was a blow to the power and prestige not only of the unions but of the blue-state budgetary model, which for two generations has been: Public-employee unions with their manpower, money and clout, get what they want. If you move against them, you will be crushed.
Mr. Walker was not crushed. He was buoyed, winning by a solid seven points in a high-turnout race. Governors and local leaders will now have help in controlling budgets. Down the road there will be fewer contracts in which you work for, say, 23 years for a city, then retire with full salary and free health care for the rest of your life—paid for by taxpayers who cannot afford such plans for themselves, and who sometimes have no pension at all. The big meaning of Wisconsin is that a public injustice is in the process of being righted because a public mood is changing." Peggy Noonan - Today's WSJ. Paid heed Mr. Stewart,
Andy Stewart, Orangetown Supervisor June 8, 2012 at 12:54 pm
Paul and Patch.com readers - here is the link to the Memorializing Resolution about the binding arbitration process that I put together and the Town Council seems poised to approve at our next regular town board meeting (the resolution is among the first few pages of the background info for the last Town Board meeting) - cut and paste this link into your browser: http://www.orangetown.com/residents/docs/backup_for_060512_Workshop_Meeting.pdf
Mike June 8, 2012 at 01:31 pm
Thank you Mr. Stewart for posting the Memorializing Resolution. All I can say if reading it is wow. The average salary is $186,000 with FREE lifetime healthcare benefits and several other nice benefits. A quick google search indicates that the median income in Orangetown is just about $82,000. Talk about inequity and not sustainable. Next question Mr. Stewart and Board- right now the resolution has no teeth- who do we contact as taxpayers and more importantly voters to give it teeth?
Ed Olsen June 8, 2012 at 02:02 pm
Go for the two year contract for now, I know it will cost more at first but at least we are not locked into 5 year deal. Maybe after November election the mode and direction of the State and Country we shift !! Also have in place a plan for layoffs,
Under all conditions the Budget curv must curv down not up !! No excuses the Buck stops with you Andy sorry. Can anthing be privatized put out for bid ?? sold, rented, Combined services with the school system ? like buliding and grounds,plowing,maintence, anthing, Can we see if Donald Trump is interested in taking Rockland State property and bulid Trump first time home comunity 200 k and under, Would be nice. He would be breaking ground next month and create many jobs. Just saying, Hey Paul and Andy thanks at least for letting us here from you, But I think we some how need to mass advertize to the public to get them involved and informed because town hall just does not cut it !! Tweet,facebook,e-mail,reverse 911, something to say hey wake up !!
Watchdog June 8, 2012 at 03:23 pm
Plain and simple...these cops are out of hand...selfish and self serving. They are hurting us, particular senior citizens. I have grown to disdain this selfishness and greed at the expense of senior citizens. The vos are "on the job" less than one-half the year with all their vacation, sick days and personal days. aybe it is time to OCCUPY ORANGETOWN and tell these cops...WE CANNOT AFFORD YOU ANYMORE.
Watchdog June 8, 2012 at 03:49 pm
The Town Leaders shoul be able to rally the citizens for a Town wide protest against these outrageous slaries and benefits. Anyone can cave in to the ...WE HAVE NO CHOICE...MANTRA. Leadership in rallying ala Scott Walker is what is needed...not wimping out to the uncaring Public Unions.
Brian Goudie June 8, 2012 at 06:14 pm
Talk vs. Action: Example 2:
A police officer's pension is determined by the last three years of salary. So it is a given that when a member of the Police Department gets ready to retire, the others police officers throw as much overtime as they can over to him/her. This effectively jacks up the amount of pension that that officer will receive at taxpayers' expenses for the rest of their life. Why not stop this abuse? Where is the courage, Paul and Andy? Do you have the guts to really deal with this? We are waiting see if you really intend to lead us out of this madness.
Mike Hirsch June 9, 2012 at 12:28 am
Andy Stewart is fast becoming my favorite elected official. The solution is really very simple. You need to start with zero and end with zero. If the best you can do with the PBA is 2.5%/year for 5 years, then decrease the police dep't budget by an equal amount. Any CEO in private industry worth his salt can reduce costs by 2.5%/year without it affecting service. Do it in Orangetown and embarass our Clarkstown local hacks into doing the same.
Bill June 16, 2012 at 03:26 am
Mr, Stewart and Valentine please dont listen to these people. lay off cops? r u kidding me. crime rates are very low here, maybe because we have good cops who work hard. in municipal services u get what u pay for.
Mike June 16, 2012 at 03:35 am
Is crime rate low b/c of PD or is it an attribute of the community? FBI crime stats show crime rate ( if you can really call it tha t) actually has decreased in Orangetown over past few years at same time the number on force has also decreased. So not sure there is a significant relationship to # of POs and crime rate.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
West Nyack June 13, 2013 at 07:03 pm
This issue is not whether Rockland County will need more water in the future which it may nor is itRead More the fact that Hudson River water can be made drinkable which it can. The primary issue is the company that wants to run the project. United Water has been a lousy corporate neighbor to West Nyack allowing old homes to deteriorate then tearing them down and doing nothing to stop the flooding south of the reservoir. If we allow them to construct the Haverstraw project they will do nothing to protect the area and if anything goes wrong they will blame someone else. When United Water starts to take responsibility for its actions and manages their facilities so as to have a minimal impact on the community then maybe they should be allowed to build Haverstraw but don't count on it.
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.