.
Feedback

Rockland: 69-Percent of Voters Hit the Polls

Election officials say Tuesday's voter turnout was on par with years past.

In the week before Election Day, Sandy's impact on the polls was looking ominous—well over half of Rockland County's polling places were without power.

But when Tuesday came around, the county didn't have to shutter a single voting station, and witnessed a voter turnout that was on par with Presidential elections of years past.

115,794 voters cast ballots, or about 63-percent of the county's eligible voters, officials said.

"And that doesn't include affidavit voting and absentee ballots," said Lou Babock, one of Rockland County's two election commissioners. "When you include those, about 69-percent of Rockland voted."

"For a Presidential election year, that number is about right," Babcock added.

By comparison, 68-percent of eligible voters in Putnam County turned out on Tuesday.

The number likely comes as no surprise to Rocklanders following the race and issues. Nanuet resident and school board member Ed Dingman said the economy and national security brought him out to vote.

“My civic duty is done," he told Patch Tuesday. "I came this morning around 9 a.m. and it was mobbed. There were so many people here to vote. I came back [at noon] and it’s still pretty busy. It [was] a good turnout; it’s an important election this year."

Babcock said he did not receive reports of excessive lines at polling places, a dilemma that plagued other states throughout the nation.

"Lines were around 15 to 20 minutes in some places," Babcock said.

Due to this, some polling stations closed at 9:20 p.m. Tuesday night, instead of 9 p.m.

The National Guard also pitched in to help the day run smoothly, Babcock said. The Guard lent generators to power polling places without juice.

Despite having all results in by 9:20 p.m., however, the Rockland Board of Elections website experienced a slight hiccup.

"We had some protocol issues on the server," Babcock said, noting preliminary results were not posted until about 10:45 p.m.

Babcock said election officials put in a call to the webmaster, who was able to make the website more responsive; by 11:30 p.m. Tuesday, the complete results were published online.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Tyler Durden November 8, 2012 at 04:55 pm
Why are people hitting Poles? They are good people! Wait until Lech Wałęsa get wind of this...
Oh and 69%? Really?
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) November 8, 2012 at 05:40 pm
On the same topic, a blog by Joseph Coe: 'Election Day 2012 Recap: The Good, The Bad...The Illegal?'
[http://newcity.patch.com/blog_posts/election-day-2012-recap-the-good-the-bad-the-illegal]
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
West Nyack June 13, 2013 at 07:03 pm
This issue is not whether Rockland County will need more water in the future which it may nor is itRead More the fact that Hudson River water can be made drinkable which it can. The primary issue is the company that wants to run the project. United Water has been a lousy corporate neighbor to West Nyack allowing old homes to deteriorate then tearing them down and doing nothing to stop the flooding south of the reservoir. If we allow them to construct the Haverstraw project they will do nothing to protect the area and if anything goes wrong they will blame someone else. When United Water starts to take responsibility for its actions and manages their facilities so as to have a minimal impact on the community then maybe they should be allowed to build Haverstraw but don't count on it.
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.
Alan June 2, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Is that what it was.....I thought it was the cicada's
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 10:43 am
Is it related to Tappan Zee Bridge construction?
Kathy Plachy June 4, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The cicadas were really loud today. Bugs just want to have fun!