.
Feedback

Police Probe Cyclist's Death; Victim Had 2 Daughters

Woman was hit by a car, killed in Upper Grandview Sunday

are continuing to investigate an accident that in Upper Grandview last Sunday, officials told Patch Wednesday morning.

53-year old Pomona resident Janet Martinez was riding along the winding road at about 2 p.m. when she was struck by a sedan being driven by Denise Patawaran, a 25-year-old from nearby Sparkill.

Patawaran has had no charges filed against her, officials said.

Now, police are seeking witnesses and working to determine what caused the accident—and who may have been at fault.

Police said Martinez was wearing a helmet at the time of the accident. She was not carrying identification, however, and police struggled to contact her kin.

Martinez was transported to and died shortly after the accident.

According to Martinez's obituary, she is survived by her daughters Kristina Curti and Jesica Laregui, who live with their families in Valley Cottage and Nyack, respectively. She also has a grandson, Preston Curti.

Martinez worked for over three decades in the Supreme Court's Appellate Division in Manhattan, and "loved the outdoors," the obituary reads.

Martinez's funeral will be held Friday, June 15 at 11 a.m. at Gracepoint Gospel Fellowship (384 New Hempstead Rd., New City.)

Visiting hours are being held Thursday at Gracepoint from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.

Police have talked with bicyclists who were in the area when the incident occurred; they noted that, to the best of their knowledge, Martinez was not riding with a group.

Neighboring authorities, like and , have noted bicyclists and motorists at odds is nothing new; read Patch's investigation of the issue from last summer .

In Patch's comment stream, a number of readers and residents weighed in on the dangers of biking along 9W.

"9W should ban cycling," one user wrote. "There are alternatives such as River Road, Route 340 and Closter Dock Road. If the bike route were altered and there better signage indicating cyclists, maybe we could make it safer, for both cyclists and motorists."

maybe we the motorists should start to use our car horns more aggressively when you come upon a group riding 2 and 3 abreast!!!!!!!heys its all about safety..you bikers dont like the honking then cycle correctly in single file!!!!!!
Issy June 13, 2012 at 08:50 pm
Having more aggressive drivers is far from the solution. I have a better idea, maybe 'we the motorists' should rent a bike for a week, then you would truly learn and understand that although most motorists are very considerate, having someone using the car as a weapon is not a fun experience.
Prime Castro June 13, 2012 at 09:32 pm
Is "Full Regalia" a classification? and does it apply to motorist? Are the same ramifications applicable to motorist/cyclist on cell phones? Double standard applies to the comments above. Perhaps its safe to say that motorist/cyclist should be aware of each other, especially in areas where cyclist exist. Right or wrong.... the unfortunate happen and its tragic to say the least.
JOHN June 14, 2012 at 02:30 am
WHY CAN'T THE CYCLIST RIDE AGAINST THE TRAFFIC SO THEY SEE THE CARS COMING AT THEM, INSTEAD OF RIDING IN THE ROADWAY AND WE HAVE TO SLOW DOWN AND RIDE BEHIND THEM BECAUSE THEY WAN'T TO RIDE 3 ABREAST. WE DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE GOING TO MOVE OUT IN THE ROAD TO MISS AN OBJECT.
Cher June 14, 2012 at 03:05 am
The cyclists ride four abreast...they are dangerous. If you honk at them to get in a single line so you can pass them safely, they flip you the bird or curse at you. Will this unfortunate death now get them banned from riding on 9W? Probably not. How many more have to die? Bike riders on 9W = DANGER for ALL.
Tyler Durden June 14, 2012 at 10:29 am
It's risky enough driving a car in the Rockland area. There are too many bad drivers on the roads for anyone to think that a plastic bicycle helmet will afford any kind of protection. Add to that the deteriorating condition of the roads and reckless riding style of many cyclists and you have the recipe for tragedies such as this. My thoughts are with the children of the deceased and with the driver of the car.
Dorothea Erichsen June 14, 2012 at 10:41 am
It is interesting to read how hostile motorist are toward bicyclist. It is a very sad and tragic accident, I am glad the driver wasn't texting. I think there are solutions which would be possible for both side and we as motorists feel the road belongs to us. 9W is not a great road for cycling granted, btu as of now we have cyclists on that road and I will make damn sure I will slow down and watch out. I don't think I would want to have the experience in my life to have his a cylcist, whether it is my fault (worse) or not. And yes everybody should abide to laws of the road. It is such an unfortunate event and I will make sure I am even more careful now. Driving a car is the most dangerous thing we do every day and this is a reminder of it. So let's all watch out and drive safely and I hope this is not going to happen to anyone. My heart goes out to the families on both ends.
nyackagain June 14, 2012 at 10:53 am
Because NYS law requires cyclist to ride in the direction of travel...that makes the most sense. Walker and runners go against traffic.
Mary Weitzman June 14, 2012 at 11:01 am
Here's what I experienced on Sunday driving north on 9W:
I was driving between Rockland Road and the entrance to the Palisades Parkway. During that stretch, three different bicyclists jumped out of the bike lane, into the car lane, in order to pass a slower cyclist. Not one of them looked to see if the coast was clear before proceeding. Not one of them used a hand signal nor any other type of indication that they were about to jump out in front of my car. Each time I narrowly missed hitting the cyclist by swerving into the oncoming lane, putting myself and my 8 yo daughter in danger. The last occurrence happened on the big incline before Lamont, nearly causing me to have a head-on collision since the road is narrower. (continued)
Mary Weitzman June 14, 2012 at 11:03 am
I live on Piermont Road. Rather than riding a bike for a week to see how bikers feel, I invite you all to spend a little time in front of my house and witness the repeated bad behavior of your fellow cyclists. It is not a few "bad apples." It is not an exaggeration to say that 3 out of 5 cyclists do not obey basic traffic laws. How can motorists attempt to "share the road" when it is impossible to predict the erratic and lawless behavior of cyclists?
A couple of proposals: Cyclists, for their own safety, should be banned from 9W between Ash St & North Broadway. This tragic accident is so sad, for both families, but it was an accident waiting to happen. There is simply not enough room for both motorists and cyclists to travel safely. If cyclists are to utilize county roads for their rides, such as 9W and 340, they should be licensed. A little education on road safety could prevent further accidents. I have never witnessed a cyclist drive defensively. Any bike club that sponsors an organized ride through our neighborhoods should be responsible for notifying the local community. Most traffic violations I've witnessed are caused by groups of cyclists, not individuals. It isn't difficult to post notices on such places like the Patch or Facebook.
would any of us walk next to a cage in the zoo with a lion or tiger in it ..where their paws could reach out and claw you?ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!Yet way too many bike riders taunt the drivers by racing past us while we are stopped at lights on our right side..as I stated a few times..In Nyack I have been passed on the right while next to parked cars!!!while sriving slowly down broadway..THAT IS NOT acceptable..For anyone to get hurt is Not Acceptable...so maybe if we all lean more on our horns if we see 2 or 3 abreast..They will get the message and realize that car horns arent something they want to hear for long periods..After a while maybe the bikers will NOT want to cause the driver to do this!!!Preventitive Medicine!!!!A cars horn blaring is not going to hurt anyone..sounds doesnt weigh much!!!and they should outlaw all bikes from any road with a speed limit over 30!!!!
being blown at is way safer than being blown off the road!!!!and if they give you a finger or curse say"WHAT WHAT WHAT??I cant hear you because of my horn!!!
BUGSPOP June 14, 2012 at 12:24 pm
Wow nice people not one of you said that you felt bad that this poor woman was dead, well than I guess I will be the one to say my condolences go out to her family...
jim kelly June 14, 2012 at 01:07 pm
Piermont and Nyack, probably more than any other part of the county, have a lot to say about the interactions of cyclists and cars. As a cyclist, I will concede that there are a lot of cyclist breaking the traffic laws, and others that certainly could be more courteous to those who need to pass them.
I want to make a "glass houses" statement here though; How many of you drivers absolutely OBEY a 30MPH speed limit? Or 55MPH (50 in spots) on the PIP? 15MPH in a schol zone? I don't mean slow down nearing the limit. I mean drive like 30s the LIMIT, 32 is too much? In the NY driving culture, drivers seem to have an agreement how much is okay to break the law, but we want to hold those stop sign running scoff-law cyclist to the letter of the law. We don't have all the information, but it appears that the cause of this tragic accident was driver distraction. It wasn't because she ran a stop sign, or because the driver had nowhere to swerve, or enough time to stop. It seems to be because the driver did not even notice she was there. Here I hear a push to get bikes off "main" roads. I've LIVED off a main road. Not everyone lives on a culdesac. Even if you get the bikes off these main roads, us people who live on these roads want to walk their dogs and check their mail. Our kids still need to wait for the school bus. So before you talk about "the erratic and lawless behavior of cyclist" look at yourselves in your mirror (but please, not while you are driving).
jim kelly June 14, 2012 at 01:09 pm
I suppose if you startle them so much that they swerve that'll be their fault too.
Rick June 14, 2012 at 01:43 pm
If I were to beep at them to move over and they gave me the finger I would resort to using the train horn on my pickup. It is DEAFENING at close range. They would either move over or defecate themselves.
smallsweet June 14, 2012 at 02:58 pm
I agree with you Bugspop not even one person Thank you so much Bugspop,
Jack D'Amico June 14, 2012 at 09:56 pm
My heart and condolences go out to Janet Martinez and her family. I am a cyclist, a motorcycle entusiast and I drive a pick up truck. I witness bad driving all day, every day, no matter how I am traveling. I see rolling stops through stop signs, speeding, aggressive driving, non use of turn signals, distracted driving and just plan rudeness. I contribute this to the dense, fast moving population in this highly congested area and the feeling of anonymity we all have when we are behind the wheel. If many of your neighbors where to recognize you and your bad behavior, you would be more mineful of your driving. Remember cyclist, motorcyclist and automobile drivers are your neighbor. Be patient, your not saving any significant time. It's not worth risking your life and the life of others,
Jack D.
smallsweet June 15, 2012 at 02:36 am
@Jack that is so sweet of you thank you very much. Today we had a very beautiful ceremony for Janet... God bless her
Lumy June 15, 2012 at 02:56 pm
Thay's why there ia a LOW SPEED LIMIT THERE! So you can see where you are going and STOP BEFORE HITTING SOMEBODY! If you are in a HURRY, take another route where you can drive 60-65 MPH. There is no EXCUSE o9ther than SPEEDING AND PASS A CYCLIST in that area.
Lumy June 15, 2012 at 02:58 pm
I agree with you!
Lumy June 15, 2012 at 03:01 pm
BECAUSE THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO BE HERE! BECAUSE IF YOU ARE IN A HURRY YOU CAN TAKE ANOTHER ROUTE...OTHERWISE "OBEY SPEED LIMIT"
Heron June 23, 2012 at 01:05 pm
It seems to me that car accidents can EASILY result from avoiding cyclists. Recently, my daughter and I were on a very winding road with a cyclist ahead of us who was biking in the middle of the road. The cyclist was uncomfortable with us hovering behind, and kept motioning for us to pass him (in an agitated way), but neither of us could see far enough ahead to know whether we would hit an oncoming car in the opposite lane. My teenage daughter is learning to drive, and is very cautious, and the nasty gestures of the cyclist were upsetting. I can very easily see how a car could swing into the oncoming lane, and get into an accident.
smallsweet June 25, 2012 at 10:21 am
We are holding a town meeting this Tuesday, 6/26 @ 7:30 in the building next to the Orangetown Police Station to reduce the speed limit on that road where Janet Martinez was killed and to post share the road signs.
Dzeldaz August 24, 2012 at 04:22 am
It doesn't matter how slowly one drives. Some curves are blind and cyclists ride four abreast instead of single file. At one intersection in New City, four or five cyclists blocked the road at a stop sign as one came around a blind curve. They were having a conversation. This is appropriate? I have cyclists in my family who pay attention to the rules of the road, not flaunt them and complain. Cyclists must conform to the rules of the road.
Dzeldaz August 24, 2012 at 04:28 am
There is no more room for a car when cyclists ride illegally and/or as if they own the road. Let them ride on bike paths rather than endanger themselves and drivers with their lack of concern. Those that care not for all users of the road can exercise out of danger's way. Having sudden movements by cyclists does not mean those in a motor vehicle are not driving defensively. Careless cyclists are offensive.
Dzeldaz August 24, 2012 at 04:33 am
Honking a horn is appropriate in a dangerous situation; and too many cyclists create those situations. What right does a cyclist have to motion a car to pass when the situation may not be safe. The cyclist is not in the car and does not have the same field of vision. Inconsiderate cyclists who create dangerous situations deserve honking as does any vehicle creating a hazard.
Dzeldaz August 24, 2012 at 04:35 am
Well written.
Dzeldaz August 24, 2012 at 04:39 am
Bravo for a well-written response.
Dzeldaz August 24, 2012 at 04:42 am
Not true. I have read this entire thread and read quite a few letters expressing sadness and condolences. I believe most of those writing and expressing anger and frustration (myself included) are doing so as a result of the unfortunate loss of life due to a cycling accident. Not everyone expresses their feelings in the same way. This entire thread, no matter a motorist or a cyclist, expresses concern for the safety of everyone on the road. We all grieve differently.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
West Nyack June 13, 2013 at 07:03 pm
This issue is not whether Rockland County will need more water in the future which it may nor is itRead More the fact that Hudson River water can be made drinkable which it can. The primary issue is the company that wants to run the project. United Water has been a lousy corporate neighbor to West Nyack allowing old homes to deteriorate then tearing them down and doing nothing to stop the flooding south of the reservoir. If we allow them to construct the Haverstraw project they will do nothing to protect the area and if anything goes wrong they will blame someone else. When United Water starts to take responsibility for its actions and manages their facilities so as to have a minimal impact on the community then maybe they should be allowed to build Haverstraw but don't count on it.
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.