.
Feedback

Vacancies: What Should Replace RJ's?

Take to the comments and brainstorm

South Broadway in downtown Nyack has an opening for a new business.

RJ's Broadway Bar and Grill shut its doors months ago, leaving the space for sale. Loopnet has the 5,000 square-foot property listed at $975,000.

The vacant storefront is right across the street from Michaelangelo's, that opened just weeks ago.

During out last Vacancies crowdsource, Patch asked . Suggestions were —readers wanted Panera and a theater, an Italian bakery and a tanning salon.

So: what should set up shop at RJ's old space?

elizabeth February 7, 2012 at 11:28 am
This section of town is so quaint. This is the village's chance to make sure it stays that way, and not to allow another noisy bar.....
Matthew Ciuccio February 7, 2012 at 11:46 am
A food market.
William Demarest (Editor) February 7, 2012 at 11:54 am
It seems like just yesterday the "Old Fashion" at this location was the place to see and be seen in Nyack, attracting local business people, residents and visitors from across the county for lunchtime, evening and late-night gatherings. It was an example of how a restaurant/pub could have a positive impact.
Catherine Paull February 7, 2012 at 12:43 pm
I miss the Old Fashion too. We used to bring our children there regularly. The restaurant business is so unpredictable and customers are so capricious!
Deanna Gould February 7, 2012 at 01:08 pm
I'm curious if anyone from local government is asking these businesses why they couldn't make a go of it. I think that's more important than what we think should replace it. Knowledge is power!
JC Brotherhood February 7, 2012 at 02:10 pm
When you see a used car for sale by the side of the road, and it remains there for a month or longer the logical conclusion is it's priced too high. Same deal with real estate. If the house across the street is on the market for over a year then the owners are asking too much, most likely because they paid too much in the first place. This cycle began when we were all extolled to believe in the "rising tide raises all boats" school of real estate. The same school that ignores the now evident reality that tides are cyclical and ebb as well as flood. Anyone who owns a restaurant will tell you how slim the profit margins are especially these days. Whoever moves in there is well advised to "do the math" first.
Stewie February 7, 2012 at 03:03 pm
How much is the rent?
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) February 7, 2012 at 04:17 pm
The building is listed as 'for sale' on Loopnet, and is asking just under $1 million.
I've just updated the story. [http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/17352764/81-83-s-Broadway-Nyack-NY/]
elizabeth February 7, 2012 at 05:55 pm
Well said, JC Brotherhood! As one who is in the real estate business, I wish more of the new tenants in some of these storefronts had inquired more carefully about the need for their type of business, before opening. They need to talk to the "locals." We can tell them what might work, and what most likely won't.
steve sun May 14, 2012 at 05:51 pm
Hi, I am interested in buying a building near RJ's, Do you think its a good location(i am not from Nyack)? What might work in that location?
thanks
Harvey August 14, 2012 at 02:03 pm
What ever you or anyone decides to open at this location better have enough cash or credit available to sustain it until they build a reputation. Good restaurants , whether "pub like" or "diner" like with reasonable prices and good food and good quality of service will eventually survive and do well. BUT if you need to barrow to buy the property Mtg and all will only increase an unrealistic "nut" you'll have to meet just to stay open. .
Harvey August 14, 2012 at 02:04 pm
If I owned the property I would divide the location into two or three (if possible) stores and rent each one out separately.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.
drostan June 19, 2013 at 03:13 pm
A Response to the Response Mr. Michael Pointing, writing on behalf of United Water, opined in theRead More Journal News (June 7) and the Nyack Patch (June 11) that an Issues Conference on the pending desalination project is unnecessary. When it is so greatly to his personal and professional benefit to support this project, how can he expect to be taken seriously? Comments on the "desal" plant have only rarely mentioned that the radioactive tritium, which each day leaks into the Hudson from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant - just 3 miles upstream from the plant - will end up, in diluted form, in our drinking water. Problem is, although highly diluted, there's no way to filter out tritium since it is chemically identical to water. Worse, there's no known safe exposure level. Like "normal" water, tritium goes into your body as fast as you drink it. Good news: about half of the tritium you do drink is filtered out by the kidneys within about ten days. Bad news: When your kitchen faucet keeps providing you with small amounts of tritium day after day, it tends to keep whatever levels you have in your body elevated. Welcome to your future, Rockland. Say, how about cracking open a nice plastic bottle of Deer Park for mixing up that baby formula? Why does United Water want this project to go forward so quickly as to necessarily preclude a thorough public education process in which all the variables and all the options can be openly discussed? What if one day you decided you don't like UW anymore and you wished the water utility was still owned by the government and not the private sector, because at least that way through your vote, you could democratically elect new people who would shut the plant down (whereas you can never "vote out" a private corporation from owning the pipes that carry your drinking water)? Let's just say arbitrarily that for the first ten years following completion of this more or less irreversible project there was an average of 500 additional picocuries of tritium per liter showing up in drinking water in Rockland County that was not there before. Even the NRC says Indian Point emits tritium into the ground water and presumably into the Hudson as well, since Hudson water is what flows - 24 hours a day - into and out of the power plant, cooling the atomic reaction that creates electrical power). In 1976 the EPA decided (more or less arbitrarily) that 20,000 picocuries of radioactivity would be roughly the "safe" upper limit for human consumption (due to drinking tritium or any other radionuclide). I say "arbitrarily" because I am aware of no one who has actually tried this since then, to see if it really turned out to be safe. Whose insurance policy would make Rockland homeowners whole again if at some future point tritium (or other radionuclide) levels skyrocketed while property values plummeted? Maybe something so terrible could never, ever happen. I certainly hope it couldn't. But why are we residents the guinea pigs, and how come we pay more - not less - for our water just so UW can do more business and, of course, collect more in utility bills? By the way, Fukushima was also never ever supposed to happen. Human health is not something you go back and study all over again once you realize you've lost it. Doesn't Rockland County have enough cancer already? Dan Rostan Nyack