.
Feedback

Shrubs (And I Don't Mean the Kind You Trim)

Shrubs, the cocktail—a way to preserve summer's bounty

You may ask what does a shrub have to do with Cocktails.

I am not referencing the boxwoods in your garden—I am speaking about Cocktail shrubs. These shrubs, with their history back to as early as the 1700's, were defined as acidulated beverages, made from fruit juice, sugar, and other ingredients often alcohol, were a way of extending the short life of fruits, pre-refrigeration. Today they are one more way to expand the Cocktail palette and add dimension.

They are made with seasonal fruit (no pesticides please), vinegar (as the acidifying ingredient) and sugar. In today's world the variations are countless. The common vinegar used is apple cider but I am partial with berries to use balsamic vinegar. Sugar, well the head spins with the varieties.

There are basically two methods for making a shrub. One involves heating up sugar and water, then adding the fruit and simmering. I myself, prefer the cold method which retains the brightness of the fruit's flavor and color.

The cold method is fairly straightforward. I generally start with a one to one ratio. One part fruit and 1 part sugar, placed into a bowl and left to macerate overnight. If the weather is warm, cover and let sit in the refrigerator. Do not hesitate to add herbs and spices into the mix at this point.The next day one is left with a thick syrup. Give a stir to mix in as sugar that has settled at the bottom. The fruit is strained off (pressing out as much of the syrup as possible, discarding the solids left behind) Whisk in the vinegar to the strained syrup and place into a clean bottle. Your shrub is ready for use. It should be kept in the fridge and given a shake before using.

The shrub lends a sweet yet tart aspect to a drink and is a delightful way to make use of the fresh fruit that is so bountiful this time of year.

Here are a suggestion of fruits, vinegars, and sugars that can be used:

Fruits

Berries of all kinds, peaches, rhubarb, plums, apricots. Find whatever is in season at your local farmer's market. Fruits should be ripe, even a little over ripe)

Sugar

White or brown cane, demarra, piloncillo, raw, I do not think I need to go on! You can choose according to the fruit used or your taste.

Vinegars

Wine, Apple cider, balsamic

Some of the combos I have made include:

  • Strawberry with balsamic vinegar and black peppercorns
  • Peach and apple cider vinegar with Thyme
  • Fig and Balsamic

As always, let your imagination and tastebuds be your guide.

You can see my award winning recipe involving a Strawberry & Black Pepper Shrub with Prosecco at http://natascocktails.blogspot.com/2012/03/mionetto-sparkler.html

And please come join the party at Nata's Cocktails Page on Facebook.

Cheers!

Nata

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.
drostan June 19, 2013 at 03:13 pm
A Response to the Response Mr. Michael Pointing, writing on behalf of United Water, opined in theRead More Journal News (June 7) and the Nyack Patch (June 11) that an Issues Conference on the pending desalination project is unnecessary. When it is so greatly to his personal and professional benefit to support this project, how can he expect to be taken seriously? Comments on the "desal" plant have only rarely mentioned that the radioactive tritium, which each day leaks into the Hudson from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant - just 3 miles upstream from the plant - will end up, in diluted form, in our drinking water. Problem is, although highly diluted, there's no way to filter out tritium since it is chemically identical to water. Worse, there's no known safe exposure level. Like "normal" water, tritium goes into your body as fast as you drink it. Good news: about half of the tritium you do drink is filtered out by the kidneys within about ten days. Bad news: When your kitchen faucet keeps providing you with small amounts of tritium day after day, it tends to keep whatever levels you have in your body elevated. Welcome to your future, Rockland. Say, how about cracking open a nice plastic bottle of Deer Park for mixing up that baby formula? Why does United Water want this project to go forward so quickly as to necessarily preclude a thorough public education process in which all the variables and all the options can be openly discussed? What if one day you decided you don't like UW anymore and you wished the water utility was still owned by the government and not the private sector, because at least that way through your vote, you could democratically elect new people who would shut the plant down (whereas you can never "vote out" a private corporation from owning the pipes that carry your drinking water)? Let's just say arbitrarily that for the first ten years following completion of this more or less irreversible project there was an average of 500 additional picocuries of tritium per liter showing up in drinking water in Rockland County that was not there before. Even the NRC says Indian Point emits tritium into the ground water and presumably into the Hudson as well, since Hudson water is what flows - 24 hours a day - into and out of the power plant, cooling the atomic reaction that creates electrical power). In 1976 the EPA decided (more or less arbitrarily) that 20,000 picocuries of radioactivity would be roughly the "safe" upper limit for human consumption (due to drinking tritium or any other radionuclide). I say "arbitrarily" because I am aware of no one who has actually tried this since then, to see if it really turned out to be safe. Whose insurance policy would make Rockland homeowners whole again if at some future point tritium (or other radionuclide) levels skyrocketed while property values plummeted? Maybe something so terrible could never, ever happen. I certainly hope it couldn't. But why are we residents the guinea pigs, and how come we pay more - not less - for our water just so UW can do more business and, of course, collect more in utility bills? By the way, Fukushima was also never ever supposed to happen. Human health is not something you go back and study all over again once you realize you've lost it. Doesn't Rockland County have enough cancer already? Dan Rostan Nyack