.
Feedback

The Civil War Sesquicentennial

The American Civil War. 150 years since our nations bloody struggle that would divide, than forge a nation.

As many a Civil War reenactor or American history buff knows, we have been  celebrating our Civil War Sesquicentennial. Exactly 150 years ago our United States were ripped apart by one of the most bitter and bloody struggles in the annals of world military history.

What one politician would predict would be just enough blood spilled to wipe up with a hankerchief, would in fact last over four terrible years ultimately taking the lives of over 620,000 men and women, soldiers and innocent citizens, young and old.

The cost would continue for years after, costing additional lives and divisions between Americans that would continue even to this day. The Northern military machine with its seemingly unlimited amount of men and supplies would eventually crush the Southern rebellion in mid 1865, generally and legally ending slavery and the early southern American "antebellum" way of life that had been established by even our founding forefathers who had put pen to our own constitution. Many knew years before the first shot on Ft. Sumter on April 12, 1861 that the institution of slavery would in fact come to a point of contention that could no longer be overlooked. The problem of the economic system designed around slavery would be threatened, and the areas that were based upon that system would be responsive.

It has been said that The Civil War did not start because of slavery. States Rights were in fact the reason, and President Lincolns' "invasion" of the south would prompt the first blood. The fact was none believed in 1861 that a war between states would last very long. Lincolns first call for Union recruits actually was only for a 3 month enlistment.

The first major battle at Manassas,Virginia would leave most going home with a different opinion after watching the first engagement firsthand as many did, or hearing of how terrible and large the battle became. The "First Battle of Bull Run" would indeed send the northern army and politicians home after a sound beating with their heads in their hands.

The 150 years Anniversary did in fact start the celebrations last year, on April 12 of course celebrating the Battle of Ft. Sumter, what is considered by most to be the opening shots of the Civil War or an official start so to speak. I write this as there had in fact been earlier shots fired on smaller scales, just not as significant possibly.

Now we have the 150 year Anniversary of the "Battle of Antietam" to be celebrated September 17, 2012. Reenactors by the thousands ( yes, thousands) have been driving to Sharpsburg, Maryland to engage in the " bloodiest single day of our Civil War". I have visited several times and the beauty of the Maryland landscape is a welcoming deception to the unbelievable and grotesque carnage that would unfold that single day.

I invite you to investigate the 150 year anniversary and the rich history of our nation and our brave Americans, both north and south who engaged in our Civil War. The large and precise reenactments will continue for years to come, but none will be as emotional and full of the facts and history as those planned until the 150 year anniversary of the surrender on April 9, 2015.

Take a trip. Enrich your families knowledge and appreciation of our nations brilliant history and our greatest struggle to maintain the Union, our United States of America.

Read more of the Civil War and the bloodiest day in America at the "Battle of Antietam" at our site. http://thecivil-war.com/civil-war-battles/battle-of-antietam/

William Demarest (Editor) September 17, 2012 at 05:37 pm
Brian... thanks for the trip back in American history!
Brian K. Gallagher September 22, 2012 at 07:30 pm
My pleasure Bill..thank you sir *

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Nyack-Piermont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:09 am
Congratulations to Nyack Boat Club and member Justin Coplan! Would love to see photos of the team inRead More action!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant location
Caleb June 13, 2013 at 10:23 pm
Untrue. Perhaps if United Water wasn't sending over 2 million gallons a day from Deforest Lake toRead More they're customers in Bergen County we would not have this shortage. Hydrologists have shown that there is enough water regularly collected in Rockland's reservoirs and aquifers for our current and growing needs. Many of the "facts" that United Water is putting forward are outdated, and are based on they're own mismanagement of our water basin. Lets remember that United Water has repeatedly been removed as a water provider of major cities throughout this country (6+ last time I checked, notably even from Camden NJ) for mismanagement of water resources. I think its a prudent choice to look into a plant that we will be stuck paying for for the next 4 years from a company that has repeatedly lied and provided water with toxin levels high above legal limits to they're customers. Better safe than sorry.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 11:59 pm
Rockland has grown to the point that it needs more water. Terminating the flow of a river and takingRead More the water resources away from other communities (stealing what we need) isn't going to happen.
drostan June 19, 2013 at 03:13 pm
A Response to the Response Mr. Michael Pointing, writing on behalf of United Water, opined in theRead More Journal News (June 7) and the Nyack Patch (June 11) that an Issues Conference on the pending desalination project is unnecessary. When it is so greatly to his personal and professional benefit to support this project, how can he expect to be taken seriously? Comments on the "desal" plant have only rarely mentioned that the radioactive tritium, which each day leaks into the Hudson from Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant - just 3 miles upstream from the plant - will end up, in diluted form, in our drinking water. Problem is, although highly diluted, there's no way to filter out tritium since it is chemically identical to water. Worse, there's no known safe exposure level. Like "normal" water, tritium goes into your body as fast as you drink it. Good news: about half of the tritium you do drink is filtered out by the kidneys within about ten days. Bad news: When your kitchen faucet keeps providing you with small amounts of tritium day after day, it tends to keep whatever levels you have in your body elevated. Welcome to your future, Rockland. Say, how about cracking open a nice plastic bottle of Deer Park for mixing up that baby formula? Why does United Water want this project to go forward so quickly as to necessarily preclude a thorough public education process in which all the variables and all the options can be openly discussed? What if one day you decided you don't like UW anymore and you wished the water utility was still owned by the government and not the private sector, because at least that way through your vote, you could democratically elect new people who would shut the plant down (whereas you can never "vote out" a private corporation from owning the pipes that carry your drinking water)? Let's just say arbitrarily that for the first ten years following completion of this more or less irreversible project there was an average of 500 additional picocuries of tritium per liter showing up in drinking water in Rockland County that was not there before. Even the NRC says Indian Point emits tritium into the ground water and presumably into the Hudson as well, since Hudson water is what flows - 24 hours a day - into and out of the power plant, cooling the atomic reaction that creates electrical power). In 1976 the EPA decided (more or less arbitrarily) that 20,000 picocuries of radioactivity would be roughly the "safe" upper limit for human consumption (due to drinking tritium or any other radionuclide). I say "arbitrarily" because I am aware of no one who has actually tried this since then, to see if it really turned out to be safe. Whose insurance policy would make Rockland homeowners whole again if at some future point tritium (or other radionuclide) levels skyrocketed while property values plummeted? Maybe something so terrible could never, ever happen. I certainly hope it couldn't. But why are we residents the guinea pigs, and how come we pay more - not less - for our water just so UW can do more business and, of course, collect more in utility bills? By the way, Fukushima was also never ever supposed to happen. Human health is not something you go back and study all over again once you realize you've lost it. Doesn't Rockland County have enough cancer already? Dan Rostan Nyack