patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mixed Reactions to Nyack H.S. Closed Campus Policy

The Nyack School Board recently voted to prohibit underclassmen from exiting school grounds during class hours; the vote has had a polarizing effect on parents.

 

The Nyack School Board's recent resolution to institute a closed campus at Nyack High School has left members of the district divided over the decision and the manner in which it was reached.

The Board, by a 5-2 margin at a July 6 meeting, decided the high school will go forward with a closed campus pilot program. The program will last until October and forbid freshman and sophomores from exiting the school during class hours.

Prevailing thought behind the decision was student safety—and the Board noted it needed to implement the policy sooner rather than later.

"The safety and well being of our students is always our number one priority," said Nyack School Board President Michael Lagana. "The time has come to take action on the issue of the open campus for the protection of our students and for helping them focus more intently on their educational opportunities."

Nyack High School was one of the last schools in Rockland County to keep its campus open to its entire student population. But in the hopes of lessening incidents of cutting and other inauspicious behavior displayed by some students, school and district administrators have been considering the notion of a closed campus for some time. Plans gained momentum this March when a committee was formed by school officials to study the possibility in greater depth.

The committee was headed by Nyack High School Principal Joseph Spero, who gave a detailed account of his group's findings at the July 6 meeting. He said studies suggested a closed campus may serve as a deterrent to cutting, foster a greater sense of interaction amongst students and faculty and help prevent any questionable activity from taking place both on and directly off school grounds.

Although no specific security measures have been put into place as of yet, Spero said the school is considering hiring additional security staff, installing cameras, building a security booth at the school's entrance and creating color coded identification cards for freshmen and sophomores.

While Board members and district officials present at the meeting could agree student safety was a priority, debate ensued over the timeframe for which any closed campus initiative should go into effect. Nyack School Superintendent Dr. Valencia Douglas said she is in favor of taking the necessary steps in ensuring the safety of her students—but felt trying to institute a major policy so quickly didn't give concerned parties enough time to establish a full-fledged plan.

Members of the community have been equally divided. Alex Lopukhin, the mother of two children currently attending Nyack High School and the proprietor of Dish Deli, a business located on the campus' grounds, is doubly dismayed by the Board's actions. She said the administrative body made a snap decision without thoroughly studying its impact and failed to receive input from the community.

"This is absolutely unacceptable," she said.

Lopukhin also believes a closed campus will turn students into unnecessary prisoners—there are only a handful of students who cut classes and get into trouble, she said.

"It is pointless to invest time and money into a program that is not a necessity when funds could desperately be utilized elsewhere," she added.

And Lopukin's assessment is not off-base—the project may require considerable money.

"The cost of hiring security to cover over a dozen doors that students have access to could be excessive," said Valley Cottage resident Mark Mangan, a former security guard at Nyack High School.

Not everyone is opposed to the change, however. Coleen Fay, a Valley Cottage resident and the mother of a Nyack High School student, said she is in favor of an open campus, and that it is a good idea to monitor the behavior of underclassmen.

The community will soon have opportunities to learn more about the program. The Nyack School Board will be revisiting the issue at its Tuesday, August 24 meeting at 8 p.m. In addition, the high school will be holding an information session Thursday, August 26 at 7 p.m. Gail Fleur, communications director for the Nyack School District said more concrete plans should be in the works by the time of these two meetings.

Related Topics: Closed Campus and Nyack High School
Parents, students—thoughts on a closed campus? Tell us in the comments.

Patch_comments_icon

William Demarest

4:56 am on Saturday, July 31, 2010

It will be interesting to see how NHS can implement a closed-campus policy for freshman and sophomores, in reality. The school has lots of exits ... seems like this could be a tough one to enforce, unless the district installs some new, high-tech security system or brings in lots more security officers.

Reply

mcccmar

2:00 pm on Tuesday, August 17, 2010

there doesnt have to be a debate over this- if parents want to allow their kids to go off campus - let them sign waivers holding the district harmless if they get hurt or kidnapped - AND provide these parents with a copy of the cut policy and have them sign for it - outline the consequences- then if the kids go- the parents said it was okay - and they are willing to accept the ramifications- the kids get to do what they want- the parents look like heros and the district is off the hook- EVERYBODY wins- but lets get real here guys - the real issue is the DRUG problem up there which has exacerbated over the last year or so= its the elephant in the room noone wants to talk about

Reply

mcccmar

8:26 am on Wednesday, August 18, 2010

again dont bother monitoring the kids- just have blanket permission s lips signed at the beginning of the year - absolving the district of any responsibility if the kids Do go - and make sure the p arents know that cutting class results in failure- THEN have the parents let the kids do what they feel is right - its between the kids and their parents

Reply

NyackMom

7:21 pm on Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Well, of course, Alex Lopukhin is against this change. It directly impacts her business in this already struggling economy. And as far as getting "buy in" from parents, students and the community I ask this-- Did NY state ask for "buy-in" before it raised the Drinking age from 18 to 19 to 21? Of course not. Our elected officials made the decision that was in the best interests of its residents . Which is what the School Board did as well. Yes, there will no doubt a cost of implementation. I think our kids are worth it. I really can't see any other down side. Fourteen and Fifteen year old kids should NOT be allowed to wander around outside the school grounds during school time. It's simply not smart, safe or in the children's best interest. In fact, it is my opinion that only Seniors that have earned the privilege of going off campus (and it is a PRIVILEGE, not a right), either through GPA or community service etc. should be allowed to do so. As parents, we rely on the schools where we send our children to keep them safe while they are there. This can't possibly be as issue that is simply "between the kids and parents" as mcccmar wrote. Doesn't it make sense that kids will have much less opportunity to cut classes if there is no place else they can go?

Reply

Leave a comment